Which scenario would NOT result in immediate action by the State Board?

The scenario involving splitting fees with colleagues would not result in immediate action by the State Board because it may not violate any laws or regulations specifically related to practice standards. Fee splitting is often viewed in the context of ethical practices and professional conduct rather than an immediately serious threat to public safety or welfare.

In contrast, impaired practice without treatment involves a psychologist who may be unable to perform their duties effectively due to substance abuse or mental health issues, which presents an urgent concern for client welfare and could lead to detrimental outcomes. Fraudulent license applications signify serious misconduct, as they compromise the integrity of the licensing process and can jeopardize public safety by allowing unqualified individuals to practice psychology. Both these scenarios typically require prompt intervention by the State Board to protect the public.

Therefore, the situation of fee splitting is less likely to invoke immediate action compared to the other options, which pose more significant and pressing risks.