What happens if a psychologist fails to submit to an examination as directed by the board?

When a psychologist is directed by the board to submit to an examination and fails to do so, this noncompliance is interpreted as an admission of the allegations against them. This underscores the importance of cooperation with regulatory bodies in the profession. When a psychologist does not adhere to the requirement, it diminishes their credibility and gives the impression that they may have something to hide regarding the concerns raised.

The rationale behind this premise is grounded in the regulatory framework that governs psychological practice. Boards have the authority to mandate examinations to ensure the competency and ethical conduct of licensed professionals. By not complying, the psychologist essentially forfeits the opportunity to contest the allegations, and the board may interpret this failure as an acknowledgment of the validity of the claims made against them.

This potential consequence is significant, as it emphasizes the importance of participation in processes meant to uphold professional standards and protect public welfare. Fulfilling such obligations is essential in maintaining the integrity of the psychological profession.