Is it a violation of the Psychology Practice Act for a sociology teacher to refer to herself as a "Social psychologist"?

Referring to oneself as a "Social psychologist" typically implies that the individual has met the qualifications and licensure necessary to practice psychology, particularly in a manner that adheres to the standards set forth by the Psychology Practice Act. In Pennsylvania, the practice of psychology is legally defined, and the title of "psychologist" and related terms should be reserved for individuals who are licensed or authorized to practice psychology in the state.

A sociology teacher, who is trained and qualified in sociology, may have knowledge of social psychology but does not necessarily have the requisite education or licensure to practice psychology. However, in the context of self-identification, if the teacher uses the term "Social psychologist" in a manner that does not suggest they are providing professional psychological services or acting as a licensed psychologist, it may not constitute a violation of the Psychology Practice Act.

Educational contexts are typically treated differently when labeling oneself, especially if the intent is clearly academic. Therefore, if the sociology teacher is using the term for educational purposes and not implying that they are practicing psychology in any licensed capacity, it is not considered a violation. This distinction is key in understanding how professional titles can be navigated within academic settings without crossing legal boundaries.