In what scenario may psychologists be protected from legal repercussions in child abuse cases?

The correct answer is that psychologists may be protected from legal repercussions in child abuse cases if they make a good faith report. This protection is grounded in the laws around mandatory reporting of child abuse, which typically shield individuals who report suspected abuse from liability as long as the report is made in good faith. Good faith implies that the individual has a reasonable belief that abuse is occurring, based on credible information or observations, rather than unfounded suspicion or malice.

The rationale behind this protection is to encourage professionals, such as psychologists, to report suspected abuse without fear of legal consequences if it turns out the abuse is not substantiated. This is particularly important in child welfare, where timely intervention can be critical to the safety and well-being of the child involved.

In contrast, other options may not afford the same level of legal protection. Reporting anonymously might prevent the reporter from facing immediate repercussions, but it does not provide a blanket legal shield and can complicate investigations. Collaborating with law enforcement or cooperating with child welfare services are valuable actions but do not inherently provide the same legal protections as making a good faith report does. The key element is the good faith aspect, which assures that reports made with honest intentions are protected under the law.