In assessing John Smith's actions as an ERT professional, which of the following will the Board review?

The correct choice encompasses a comprehensive evaluation of John Smith's actions by considering multiple critical factors that define the performance and conduct expected of Emergency Response Team (ERT) professionals.

The Board will review whether his actions align with activities that are generally accepted as part of the ERT scope of practice. This ensures that he is operating within the parameters of his designated role and performs tasks that are recognized and authorized for ERT professionals.

Additionally, assessing whether his behavior is consistent with the specific training he has received is essential. This criterion ensures that he applies the skills and knowledge acquired through training effectively and appropriately in real-world scenarios.

Finally, evaluating adherence to the code of ethics for ERT professionals is crucial for maintaining professionalism and integrity in this field. Ethics in practice guide ERT professionals in making sound decisions that prioritize the welfare of individuals and communities they serve.

By considering all these aspects—scope of practice, training consistency, and ethical guidelines—the Board can arrive at a well-rounded assessment of John Smith’s actions, ensuring both accountability and professionalism in the field.