If a client reveals a plan to euthanize a terminally ill brother, what should the therapist do?

When a client reveals a plan to euthanize a terminally ill brother, the therapist has a duty to protect both the client and others who may be affected by the client's actions. Reporting the plan to the authorities aligns with the legal and ethical obligations of the therapist to prevent harm. In situations where there is a potential for imminent danger to another individual, confidentiality may be breached in order to prevent harm and ensure safety.

This action is justified because therapists are mandated reporters when there is a risk of harm to oneself or others. Euthanasia, while potentially seen in some contexts as a compassionate act, remains a serious legal and ethical issue that needs to be addressed with appropriate channels, especially given the potential legal consequences of the act. Reporting helps to ensure that the necessary legal and therapeutic measures can be taken to address the situation properly and responsibly.

In contrast, encouraging the client to weigh risks versus benefits could downplay the seriousness of the situation and might not lead to any intervention that protects the brother. Remaining silent undermines the therapist's responsibility to protect and intervene in potential harm to another individual. Lastly, simply informing a colleague without taking direct action to report the plan may not fulfill the therapist's obligations and could delay critical intervention that might be necessary for the