Can an unlicensed employee of a corporation perform tests for employment placement without violating the Psychology Practice Act?

The assertion that an unlicensed employee of a corporation can perform tests for employment placement without violating the Psychology Practice Act is grounded in specific provisions of the law that allow for alternatives to direct licensure requirements in certain contexts. In Pennsylvania, there are instances where non-licensed staff can conduct employment assessments provided they are in alignment with the scope of their role within the organization and the nature of the tests being administered.

Unlicensed employees may carry out testing as long as the tests are designed for employment purposes, do not require psychological intervention, and are utilized in compliance with employer policies and applicable labor laws. For example, if the tests are standardized assessments aimed at evaluating skills or aptitudes without delving into psychological diagnosis or treatment, they may fall outside the purview of requiring a licensed psychologist to administer them.

It's also essential to note that while the performance of such tasks may be permissible, the corporation must ensure that proper protocols are followed to maintain compliance with ethical standards and applicable regulations. This includes ensuring confidentiality and the integrity of the testing process.

While supervision by a licensed psychologist may be beneficial for ensuring adherence to ethical and professional standards, the law does not categorically prohibit the unlicensed performing of such tasks as long as they adhere to the outlined parameters. Thus,